Healthcare systems are complex, high-pressure environments where decisions are often made quickly and under strain. But what if every choice from physical layout to onboarding protocol was made with healing and emotional well-being in mind? Diving into the power of intentional design, drawing on lessons from tech, retail, and personal experience to offer healthcare professionals a roadmap for creating environments that support both patients and caregivers.
On today’s episode of In Network's Designing for Health podcast, Nordic Chief Medical Officer Craig Joseph, MD, talks with Greg Aukerman, Co-founder of The Outcomes Institute. They discuss Greg’s unconventional journey from retail and tech support to healthcare experience design, which led to the founding of The Outcomes Institute. They also discuss accidental vs. intentional design in healthcare and further exploring how unintentional design choices affect patient experience and outcomes.
Listen here:
In Network's Designing for Health podcast feature is available on all major podcasting platforms, including Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, iHeart, Pandora, Spotify, and more. Search for 'In Network' and subscribe for updates on future episodes. Like what you hear? Leave a 5-star rating and write a review to help others find the podcast.
Want to learn more from Dr. Joseph? Order a copy of his book, Designing for Health.
Show Notes:
[00:00] Intros
[03:00] Founding the Outcomes Institute
[04:20] The impact of a room placement
[07:30] Accidental versus intentional design in healthcare
[09:00] Fragmented systems
[12:30] Designing for outcomes
[14:50] Reimagining onboarding
[24:00] Fixing the relationship not just the device
[35:38] Greg’s favorite well-designed things
[38:23] Outros
Transcript:
Dr. Craig Joseph: Greg, welcome to the podcast. Where do we find you today?
Greg Aukerman: Thanks for having me. I am in my lovely home office in Cincinnati, Ohio.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Excellent, excellent. So, tell us, you're really into this kind of health care experience design. There's not a lot of people that that are into that that have done that. So, I'd like to hear about kind of how you got to where you are today.
Greg Aukerman: So, from an early age, I was labeled as gifted, which means I have wrestled with self-doubt my entire life. I have a bit of an odd background, and I've come very late to the world of health care in terms of my career. I cut my teeth in the retail space. I was a trainer and a lead for the Genius Bar for Apple. So, I was one of those people who can help fix phones and computers. And I got to lead a team with two other people, about 80 technicians. And it was one of the most formative experiences. And in, learning how to de-escalate, really any situation and always be able to care for the person right in front of me.
From there, I had a bit of a career in market research. It was qualitative market research, all very small-based size. So, if it was a consumer-packaged goods company or a pharmaceutical company, even if we were doing a study on, let's say, paper towels, we would spend 3 or 4 hours in your house learning about you and your life and the things that you're wrestling with. The idea there is that the better we understand a person and the different factors that they are dealing with, the better products we can design for them. From there, I got into a little bit of nonprofit work where I learned a whole lot about how to be kind of a Swiss Army knife in every situation and then moved into consulting. And in consulting, I really stayed in the areas where I was the most familiar. So, tech super packaged, good retail space, and those types of experiences. And then the combination of real-life fate and career fate kind of moves me in the healthcare space. And I fell in that pretty hard, in a good way. Several of my family members became sick with a number of things that they were dealing with, and I found myself at their bedside advocating for them and helping them navigate the healthcare system.
And at the same time, I had the opportunity to join some projects in a consulting firm where I got to work with healthcare institutions directly. And it was kind of this awakening
for me, where I realized that this background and creating experiences for people and caring for them face to face. And designing from their perspective, something that is empathic and resonant is something that I may be able to use to help health care. And I come from the lens and come from the perspective that there's a lot of really, really good things that are happening. And I wanted to pick up a tool and kind of pitch where I could, in the healthcare space. So that is a quick journey through the different experiences that kind of led me to where I am today, and trying to make an impact with my unique background in healthcare.
Dr. Craig Joseph: And to do that, you've started a new firm. So, tell us a little bit about it.
Greg Aukerman: So, whatever's inside of you is what comes out all the time unintentionally, intentionally, all the time. And I am here. And the reason that I jumped on board and started this company is to help care for people who care for others. And also, personally, it doesn't hurt being surrounded by smart people who share a common why of the impact they want to have, but disagree on how, because it creates some really sharp conversations and potentially some innovative ideas.
Dr. Craig Joseph: You and I met when I was in the audience at the American College of Healthcare Executives, and you gave a talk and shared a story about your mother. And she had a stroke, and I was moved, I think as much of the as the entire audience was. And, afterwards came up and said, I need to talk to you and try not to scare you off. And obviously, I was successful. I've not scared you off. Tell us what this, you know give us a summary of what happened to your mom and how it influenced you.
Greg Aukerman: A few years ago, my mom had a stroke, and I'm not going to bury the lead or anything like that. She's doing very, very well. Her recovery and the care that she received was phenomenal. And she's doing really, really well. But as it was happening, there's a lot of fear. There's a lot of questions, there's a lot of uncertainty. And when your family looks to you as a person who can most expertly navigate the health care system, you feel a lot of pressure that's there. And I think the part of the story that has really stuck with me is about intentional design of experience versus accidental design or experience or intentional care versus accidental care. And let me explain what I mean. So first of all, like I said, she had phenomenal care, really communicative staff, I really appreciate everyone who was involved in that. She got through the ED and was transferred to a neuro ICU. And when she got to her room, she was placed in a room where she's kind of in the corner next to the door, and her right side is up against the wall.
So to her from the bed, the left side is where all the people are. It's where the room is. It's where the activity is. And she had a stroke in the right side of her brain. So at that point she had a whole lot of difficulty, even acknowledging anything on the left side of her body. She couldn't see out of that size. She couldn't move out of that side. Nothing existed over there for her. And as people were coming in out of the room answering questions, checking on mom, checking on us, providing excellent care, somebody said in kind of an offhand comment, it's lucky that she was assigned to this room, because forcing her to acknowledge the left hand side of her body and the room and the space that she was in can help her heal. And that's a comment that stuck with me forever. Not only the fact that it was lucky that she was there, but that something as basic as where a person is in space or the room that they're assigned in a hospital could actually help. The healing process was kind of revolutionary, and I know that room assignments can be very, very challenging.
There's things like, you know throughput and staffing and all the different things that need to happen to get somebody a space in some of those spaces at a premium. But it made me start to ask the question internally, what were to happen if every decision that we make on patient's behalf, from not only the care they receive, but the places that they go, was done intentionally with their healing and their experience top of mind. That's a bit of the story that I told at ACA, and it's one of the ones that's kind of stuck with me and has shaped how I view my work, how I view healthcare, and the impact that I hope to have with some of the ideas that pop into this crazy brain of mine.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Intentionality really kind of goes through everything that is your work. I talked to people and I, we talked about design sometimes, and they said, well, I, I don't do designs. And I'm like, well, you do actually, you going to meetings and you've written emails. You actually do design. You just don't call it that. But a lot of what you do is accidental. Like, you didn't really think about it. And I think that I'm sure that comment that you got from that health care worker, was it just kind of just came out and just they left it and if you went to them and said, you know I kind of started a company a little bit based on some words that you said to that person, you could find that person, they would probably deny saying it, right.
They wouldn't have even remembered saying it was probably just some off comment. But it's the intentionality. So, can you give us some other examples of where a health care system or a hospital or clinician wasn't intentional in some of the design that they did, and the outcomes were maybe not bad, but not necessarily good?
Greg Aukerman: Happy to share a couple examples there. One that comes to mind immediately. And its lower stakes if you will. But you see it a lot. And I've seen it a lot in the organizations that I've got to, to work with. As primary care clinics, urgent care clinics, kind of that, that gray area, quick care clinic, start to move to, like, electronic check in. One of the things that you see specifically in the physical space and environment is there's no longer a human being that's there to help you check in for your appointment. And you go to a machine to help you check in, which is not inherently bad. And sometimes that can save a whole lot of time, especially pre-registering. It's like two taps and you're in and you're ready to go.
But what happens? Or the, the way that the environment kind of combines is that you are going into a space that was initially designed to have a person have an interaction with you. So you walk in and see the front desk of any of these places, and there's a sign that says, welcome, go here to check in, which to me, as a patient who might not understand, like what's happening, it's like, welcome, you're already wrong. Go away and go do something else. There's no one here to talk to you. Which can put you at a less than desirable mental state. You might. You're already coming in with a concern or maybe a fear. And now you're like, well, I've already screwed something up, and there's nobody to talk to, so I guess I have to figure this thing that happens a lot right now.
As the as the industry seems to be migrating towards these more automated checking things, the space, the physical space that they inhabit hasn't yet caught up. Another one. And this is this is a little bigger. And it's also much, much more complicated, is one that I got to witness again with a family member. The family member was having a seizure and, was there, got treatment to kind of relax and sleep, which was explained really, really well by the provider there that think about it like your bullet, your brain, blue screens like a computer and you need to reset it and it the sleep is the best thing you could possibly get. I love this. I thought it was a great analogy. It was clear it was in my language. Then we get into the area of unintentional design where family member is asleep in a bed and is surrounded by a number of devices and systems patient monitoring, infusion pumps, bed alarm, call button, all of them made by different companies and different brands.
All those companies and brands are staffed by brilliant people that create these products that can help deliver care. But the combination of all these different brands with their own ideas of patient experience and the journey that the patient and the provider take and using the equipment are not integrated. And the way that that showed up for this particular family member is that under sedation, they woke up three different times by alarms. One of those alarms connected to a central monitoring system that talks back to a nurses’ station. And it was able to be deactivated and addressed to other ones, weren't they weren't integrated, they weren't connected. They had a different sound by a different company. And they actually woke this person up three times. And all of them were false positives. Now, in the grand scheme of things, is that huge? Is that really going to affect someone's care journey? I don't know probably not. It's alarms. And you want to pay attention to things that the designers and the providers say are things to observe or concerns to have when one of these alarms go off. But the integration of the system and getting these things to talk to each other and thinking through what it means to put a patient in a room that has, you know 11 different companies putting together these devices that are supposed to help not only the care team, but the patient itself that can produce some less than optimal outcomes in that health care setting.
Dr. Craig Joseph: You mentioned one kind of reimagining of the hospital space. What can hospitals or health care systems do to kind of start thinking about being more innovative in their design of their physical spaces?
Greg Aukerman: I wish it was a simple answer. But it is. I think it's a complicated response to that question, and it's determining what are the outcomes that you want to deliver. And if the outcome that you want to deliver is that every decision that we make. I'm making this up as we go. Every decision that you make is designed and will benefit the patient's recovery. Let's say that the thing that you want to do or, I believe, I'm not going to say the name even though I want to brag on them. I believe there's a healthcare network out west that recently said that one of the outcomes that they want to do is that every step they want to remove as much fear, angst, and anxiety as possible.
Those are goals that you or outcomes that you can design around. So if you as an organization with leadership buy in from the top to the bottom, say everything that we were going to do is going to be to benefit the care and rehabilitation of the patient, or everything that we're going to do is going to reduce fear and anxiety. There's a number of changes or decisions that need to be made and all the supporting systems. So how rooms are assigned, how different floors are staffed, the types of decisions that are given to a patient and the types of choices that they have, the types of interactions, all level up to that outcome that you want to see. That's where the real work comes in. It's determining and aligning the organization behind that outcome that they want to focus everything towards. And then making every system, every part of the organization, every different entity that makes up the whole hospital, or the whole hospital network focused and driving towards that one decision. And it's big and it's scary.
And you can use words like transformation and that's really, really freaky. But it can start with small things, and it doesn't have to be, you know some of the giant and sweeping. But to say out loud, like this organization did out west, that we want to reduce fear and anxiety right now, we can take some steps towards it and see if we can get some momentum.
Dr. Craig Joseph: So, kind of again, kind of getting back to intentionality and thinking through from the from the patient's perspective, you know what can I do to kind of minimize fear and anxiety? Let's pivot a little bit, but off fear and anxiety and talk about onboarding. And we'll start with onboarding employees, which is something that you've done. Certainly, there's excitement there. You're starting a new job. There's a lot of fear and anxiety there, too. Should be, and it's a new place. And you don't understand the culture, and you don't know anyone and all of that. So, did you help clients with overhauling their employee onboarding process? And then after this, we'll talk about how that is applicable for health care.
Greg Aukerman: I may use examples inside and outside of health care as we kind of talk through this. Onboarding is interesting because you're right, there's a whole lot of potential. There is an individual and an organization that have said yes to going on this journey together, and we have to figure out how we're going to make it happen. And sometimes, specifically in the healthcare space, that initial onboarding experience can be incredibly overwhelming. Or it could be dry. Let me explain what I mean by that. I have a couple of friends that are onboarding in different health care organizations. Right now, there's a lot to learn not only about how things are done, but also different things can be done in terms of compliance and regulatory requirements to make sure that they're able to do the jobs that are there.
So, onboarding, like what we talked about a little bit ago, can be modified based on the outcome that you want to see. So, for example, a health care network that I had the opportunity to work with, their initial onboarding experience was really dictated by the need to ensure that new hires met regulatory requirements. How that manifested is that their first day on the job was eight hours remotely in front of a computer doing regulatory training, and that was for operational staff, for clinical staff, it was for everybody. And while it is important, believe me, I am. I'm not going after making sure that you are certified and meet regulations and things like that, it did not create an inspiring experience for people who have said yes to a journey on delivering care, and that is what we worked to pivot regulation and making sure that these courses are taken are important.
But it might not be so important that you need to do it on the very first day. So, we put together a kind of an overview of what the first year can look like on the job for operational teams and providers and things like that. And it starts with the first day. That is really all about connecting your why. So why did you say yes to this journey within healthcare or within, practicing medicine of this organization and how do you connect to the why of that organization. So, we did things like, be able to we were able to create some initial videos to give people an understanding of why they were there. We had more discussion-based ideas. We have a chance for them to start thinking about the moments that they create with patients or with their team members. We had some visible executives come in to provide a little bit of time to answer questions, tell a little bit of their story and their why, all to create this really, really memorable first day where you got to feel a little bit of appreciation and connection to the organization, as opposed to just kind of checking some boxes.
From there, we had a number of things that we put together from onboarding kits that were boxes that would either be waiting for somebody at the facility or be sent to their house that had not only the typical things like, hospital swag, coffee mugs, things like that. But also, something that has a little bit of flavor from the book. So locally roasted coffee or candy from areas that surround the hospitals just to reinforce that idea that this is a place that not only cares for people but is also active in the community. And there's parts of that community that are there with you. We put together, kind of by quarter, a deep dive into each individual value of the hospital, values and mission and things like that, I think are incredibly important, but only as so far as they are embodied and understood otherwise, they're just words on a wall. We wanted to make sure that those were internalized and contextualized. So, if this is one of our values, how does it come to life for me as a Nurse Practitioner, how does it come to life for me as somebody who works in environmental services? So, we had quarterly dives into those.
We had cohorts that met with new hires, so they had a chance to develop some relationship on day one and through that first week, and then had a chance to continue to grow that relationship throughout. And it was really wildly successful. And it was one of those things that I like to work, in the work that I do as. Yeah, we're going to work with you, we're going to co-create with you, and then we're going to be able to hand that over so that you can run it. And one of the most rewarding things for me, aside from the feedback from new hires, was that, “hey, this was awesome. I felt seen, I felt known, and I felt valued from day one”, where some of the like learning and development trainers who used to do the eight hours of regulatory training that are now leading these experiences where people have a chance to explore their values. And it was a great transfer to say.
Dr. Craig Joseph: So how does one kind of take that? And we were talking about how that's actually true of almost any employer. Right. Your experience was with a health care system but could be valid for anyone. How can a health care system pivot from thinking about onboarding employees to onboarding patients? So, we're not going to make the patients watch videos, although sometimes we do. But usually, it's on the on their way out, not on the on their way.
Greg Aukerman: Yet I have got to brag on them, and we can use them or not. But Cincinnati Children's oh my gosh I'm a huge fan. And for having children who experience procedures, some of those procedure videos are top notch. Is it reduces some of the anxiety. And that's amazing. Those videos, great bad actors? Not so much. But how do we onboard patients and their families? Like, I love this question. Intersects something that I believe and that the company that I co-founded kind of works to create. And this may be a little bit weird. This answer may be weird, but you're going to come with me on this journey, and I swear it's going to be great. The thinking that informs it is connected to the idea of missionaries.
And let me explain what I mean. When you think about missionaries, you can think about religious missionaries or folks that maybe work for the peace Corps, or maybe even habitat for humanity. These are people who believe they have something of value, and they go to a place that needs that value that they have, or they think need the value that they have, and they are willing to learn local language, local customs, local culture to fit in and provide something that has value and a service for the folks that are around them. In that example, those missionaries that are going out are doing all the code switching. They are learning all new things. They are taking on all the responsibility to figure out how to navigate that place that they are going to. When you think about people coming to a health care organization, that equation is flipped completely. The missionary at that point is the patient and the patient's family.
They have to understand the new language. When they get into this health care situation, they have to understand the customs, the expectations, the barriers, the code switching that they need to have coming into a place where they think they are going to receive value as opposed to give value. And it is underlined by this idea and this reality that they're not super jazzed to be there because they may be scared, they don't know what the answer is, or they may be hurt. And they may have a whole lot of fear underlying it. So, thinking more like a missionary, is what kind of drives what patient onboarding can look like. And what I mean by that is, if you think about, a person who is new to your healthcare network or maybe just new to your clinic if you're in private practice or things like that, thinking about what do they need to know to succeed? What do they need to know to communicate their concerns properly? And some of the things that that we have seen work in the past is being really, really clear about the types of questions and the language that you use when someone comes in for the first time, or when they fill out a request for an appointment online to get at not only the chief concern that's bringing them in or their biggest concern, but what else is going on inside those beautiful brains of theirs?
What are they concerned about? What do they have questions about? So that you are taking some of the cognitive load off of that patient or that patient's family and taking it on yourself by thinking through those interactions and those types of onboarding experiences. You don't want them to be a missionary. You want them to come to you feeling at ease and ready to receive care that you're ready.
Dr. Craig Joseph: I feel like a lot of it is similar to, what you learned and kind of developed at Apple. And you teased us. It was a tease a little bit, a little bit ago, you teased us that you were a genius and helped train other geniuses. I'm curious. One of the things that you talked about when we were preparing for this conversation was the idea of fixing the relationship, not just the device that when someone comes in for help, it's not just the fixing of the device, it's the whole relationship. So how what does that mean? I have some ideas, but what does what does that mean in reality?
Greg Aukerman: What it means in reality specifically from the point of view that that I got to expose to, while I worked for Apple is that the device is always secondary to the relationship and the trust that you can develop with the person. Some of those interactions are intense. Some of them are, you know business leaders who need to get a file. Some of them are I just lost all my photos and this person is no longer with us to, you know I'm late for a meeting and there's a whole lot of emotion that is tied into these devices that we use to run our lives, run our social circles, run our businesses. And though the devices can and do break from time to time. And so sometimes software can get buggy and it needs to be, fixed. The most important thing to do in any interaction is to repair the relationship with the person standing right in front, and it's to get to what is the thing that is driving their concern. At its core, it's easy to say, hey, you have a broken iPhone. Here's a new iPhone. Or hey, you spilled some coffee in your laptop. It doesn't turn on anymore. We can get that fixed for you. What takes time and focus and attention and a little bit of art science is being able to empathize with the person who's right in front of you. And there's a couple of mindsets and frameworks that Apple uses and trains in order to kind of focus and refocus what that interaction can look like, which I'll talk about in a second.
But the one thing that I will add before we go there is when it comes to onboarding, at least when I did this at, a while ago, I'm not going to say exactly how long, because I don't want to talk about how old I am and why I have gray hair. But the onboarding process for people who are doing tech support is three weeks of training, two weeks were interpersonal interaction and one week was tech was technical training. You fix anything with, within a week of technical training? But it takes a while to kind of understand the art, the science, the interpersonal action. With that in mind, one of the mindsets that has stuck with me that was trained by Apple is this idea that anyone who ever shows up in front of you have three jobs to do with them, and they are to acknowledge a line and assure the three A's acknowledge, align assure Or if you want to talk about it in Cool Genius Bar, speak from the mid. Whenever I worked there, it was like, I feel your work cool. And what that means is anybody who comes in, you want to acknowledge the concern that they have, you want to make sure that they are seen, that they are heard, that you understand what they're there to fix.
You are then going to align with them to make sure that they understand that you've got this together. We've got this, and we're going to find a solution. We're going to get this thing fixed regardless of what it is. And then the final is the assurance is that this is the path that we're going to go on together. The thing that's really nice about mindsets like that and that can transfer, I think, to health care really well. And quick caveat I understand that replacing an iPhone is much simpler than providing medical care for individuals. So, I'm not going there. But the thing that's really nice about those mindsets is that even in high pressure, high emotional, high stress interactions, it's easy to reach back and go, I have no idea what to do here, but I do know that I'm supposed to acknowledge the concerns, align with them, and assure them that we have a path forward so when the mind is kind of hijacked by the brain getting into fight or flight mode, little easy to remember, deeply implanted things like those three A's, tend to stick around so that you can make decisions and find some clarity and find a way forward and de-escalate situations. From that training that you receive.
Dr. Craig Joseph: I think it's very relatable to what we do in health care. From what you're talking about, from a customer service perspective. And it's not the technology, it's the relationship. You mentioned a patient transport team at a, at a large teaching hospital, and you did some work there. And I was fascinated when you were telling this story about how you kind of took something that was, wasn't really perceived as being a net positive, made it into something that was, you know much better.
Greg Aukerman: We were brought into this patient transport department to help solve a couple of team culture and kind of team internal brand issues that they were running into where, this patient transport department was working at this large academic medical center that, like, larger, lots of large academic medical centers are old in terms of this structure. Because of that, there are constant renovations which trickle down to and on to the outcome of those reservations is it takes a long time to get somebody somewhere on a stretcher when half your elevators don't work. That is just one of the outcomes that they were dealing with. And because of that, they were receiving some of the brunt of the ire of not only the patients, but also some of the people who are working within the institution. So that was one of the things that they were dealing with. And the other was this idea that they were always onboarding, constantly onboarding where they had trouble keeping people in the team long term.
So we went in to do a little bit of exploration to kind of find out some of the why behind, what was going on with the institution, and what was going on with the team and provide some recommendations on how they may change some of those, factors that were leading to the outcomes that were a little bit less than desirable for the people on the team, those folks that really so, on the kind of team brand and how they were being treated, what we discovered is that, yes, there were some, factors that were causing them to provide some service that may be less than ideal when it came to the perspective of people at the hospital and patients that are there. There's also a communication outage, and a little bit of an outage around the vision of what they wanted to do, that they had this idea and this, kind of saying that was kind of just words on a wall that we are the heart of this hospital. We are that we move people from place to place to receive treatment. And they didn't feel like that. They used a couple other choice words for anatomy of what they felt like, and so they needed to kind of reset those, those expectations internally and start to more proactively communicate, with their partners and with patients what's going on and not in the way to place blame.
But if you show up to a situation and you're like, hey, sorry, we're a little bit late, this is what's going on, I'm happy to be here. Now, if you have any questions, as we get you to where you need to go, and reinforce in that communication, was really, really helpful when it came to something that they could operationalize really quickly. It was something as simple as if you're late, communicate, easy to put in mind, easy to enact, and make decisions based on it. If you were running late and those were one of the things practically that, started to catch on the other onboarding is, is a little bit more interesting and I think a little bit more, exciting. What we discovered, and this is not technically abnormal. There was a, medical device company that I got to work with where they were experiencing the same thing in their sales team, where they were constantly onboarding. No one was staying at work. When you looked at it from a little bit more macro lens and you're saying, okay, why are people leaving?
And more importantly, after they left, where are they going? They're not leaving the organization. They weren't leaving this medical center. They weren't leaving the medical device company. They were moving on to other things. What was discovered is that training and patient transport. And in this other example, sales was the doorway into these institutions. So instead of thinking about, all the time and resources that they felt were wasted in onboarding these people, it required a shift in mindset to say, all right, not we are not a place that struggles with retention. We are a launchpad. When someone comes in here, start the clock, because within two years they're going to be on to the next thing. What can we do to give them the best experience possible to prepare them with the institutional knowledge that they need to navigate, these organizations so that they can take all the goodness that they learned in patient transport about how to care for people and empathize with people and communicate with people and be on vision, or how we talk about our products and how we represent our brand to the world. In the case of medical device, how do we take those skills and cascade them throughout the organization? Because we know we are launching people forward. And if that's a design criteria to go back to talking about experience design that you are going to onboard people, you're going to have them for less than 24 months and you're going to onboard them again, it causes a whole different set of decisions to be made when it comes to maximizing that time and maximizing the investment and then the individual.
And it changes how people regard your part of the organization. Man, you want somebody really, good in this next in where you're hiring from, you should look at sales. You should look at patient transport because they know what they're doing there. And they have people that are ready for what's next.
Dr. Craig Joseph: These are folks that are working throughout the hospital like they're not on one department. You know you mentioned neuro ICU. You know you could be in the ICU for decades, actually, as a nurse or a neurologist. And you know how that plays functions backwards and forwards. But it may be a little bit about the emergency department and a tiny, tiny bit about the floor because you have to send patients there. But other than that, you have no clue how the place runs, and you need not have a clue because that's outside of a outside of your world. But transport, they go everywhere and they do everything, and they have to deal with all kinds of different personalities. That's great. And they kind of acknowledge that, hey, it's not bad that we're constantly hiring and putting people in this position. It's actually good because they're not leaving the organization. They're going on to greater, bigger and better things. And that certainly would be an incentive for a lot of folks who think about, well, I don't want to do this for 20 years. Well, statistically speaking, you're not. Well, I was going to say we've run out of time.
And, before we let you go, there's a lot that we need to digest of everything that you said. So much, so much good stuff and learning there. But before I let you go, we always like to ask the same question. We like to talk about design. Are there 1 or 2 things that are so well designed in your life that they bring you joy whenever you interact with them?
Greg Aukerman: Might be a little odd, but for me, it's my bicycle. There is a YouTuber who his name is James Thomas, Bike Fit James, and I've never met him in real life. I hope to, but he is really into the measurements and how a person interacts with a bicycle. And that, if it is too long or too short or too tall or things like that, it can cause you all sorts of muscle issues and tendon issues that may or may not be related to the part that needs to be moved in. Anything in the chain of human motion can cause all sorts of issues. And the reason that I kind of follow this guy, and the reason I think my bike is the most well designed thing that I interact with on a daily basis, is he once said, and this is another thing that stuck with me, humans can absorb an incredible amount of dysfunction, which means that, you can ride a bike that doesn't fit you for hundreds of miles. It's been said it's one of the most efficient methods of transport that we've ever designed. As a species. And once you have it dialed in, where it fits the length of your legs, the length of your arm, the length of your torso, the size of your head, which actually plays a role in In Balance and Gravity. It feels incredible.
It feels incredible to have that dysfunction removed. And the bike, I think, is the most well-designed thing that I have. And that thinking goes directly into everything we talked about today. Humans can absorb an incredible amount of dysfunction. We're very, very good at it. Whether it's physical dysfunction or mental dysfunction or organizational dysfunction. But when it's removed and when things are designed to fit us perfectly, it's a pretty incredible and special thing that we feel. And the type of work that we do, or the type of miles that we ride, can increase exponentially.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Having ridden bad bikes before. Yeah, man. Kind of need a mentor guru to help you size that bike and to make those adjustments and to tell you it's worth putting money into this aspect, but not worth money putting money into that aspect. You're not going to get the benefit out of it. Awesome. All right. And do you want to give a shout out to is there a particular bike, brand or company that you love?
Greg Aukerman: I never thought I would actually do this. I'm going to quote this James Thomas guy, who I've never met, but is a guru. His whole thing is fit first, buy later. Who cares what the brand is? Figure out what fits you. That's going to bring you the least amount of function, the most amount of pleasure and joy, and go buy that.
Dr. Craig Joseph: That is great advice. Greg Aukerman, thank you so much. This was great. We learned so much, or at least I did, really appreciate it. Look forward to watching your company grow and expand. Do great things and we'll have you back after you've got more experiences of cool things to share with us.
Greg Aukerman: I'll be more than happy to. Thanks so much for having me on. I really appreciate the opportunity.
READ THE TRANSCRIPT
Show Notes:
[00:00] Intros
[00:09] Marina’s background and her book: The Vagina Business
[01:29] Gender data gaps
[02:52] The emergence of Femtech
[04:00] Innovation and obstacles in birth care
[05:30] Title controversy and pushback
[13:02] Femtech vs. Scamtech
[14:09] The pink tax in healthcare and global innovations
[27:03] Marina’s favorite well-designed thing
[28:52] Outros
Transcript:
Dr. Craig Joseph: Marina Gerner. Welcome to the podcast. Where do we find you today?
Marina Gerner: Thank you so much for having me. I'm sitting on my chair in London in the UK.
Dr. Craig Joseph: We are talking today because someone connected us about your book. And so, you put out a book recently, The Vagina Business.
Marina Gerner: That's right. And the subtitle is The Innovative Breakthroughs that Could Change Everything in Women's Health.
Dr. Craig Joseph: So, give us the backstory. Why don't you kind of give us a little introduction as to how you got to where you are and how you got to write a book that's called The Vagina Business.
Marina Gerner: My background is that I'm a journalist, and I also have a side hustle as an adjunct professor at the NYU Stern School of Business, and I've always been interested in the stories of women, whether that's in, you know, technology or health or business. So that's been my focus for a while. And then a few years ago, I learned that if you ask most people to imagine a person who's having a heart attack, most people tend to picture an old white man and the symptoms they think of is pressure on the chest and then pain radiating down the left-hand side.
And I learned that those symptoms are typical for men, but they're not typical for women. And I thought that was so shocking. You know, and as a result of that, women are 50% more likely to be misdiagnosed after having a heart attack. We also wait longer to seek help. Our symptoms are considered atypical. They're more likely to include things like jaw pain and long-term fatigue, for instance.
And women also experience that pain and the pressure on the chest but were more likely to describe it as discomfort. And so, I learned there was this issue. And I also met the founder of a company called Bloomer Tech, and the founder is called Alicia Chong Rodriguez. And what her company has created is what I thought is the coolest thing. It's a smart bra that can help women who are at risk monitor their heart health. And I thought, this is wonderful. You know, not only is there this huge problem, but there are also people who are creating new things that might be part of the solution, and that might help us fill that particular gender data gap. And I approached her about an interview.
I messaged all of my editors about this story of the smart bras, and then I kept looking at my inbox and there was just tumbleweed. Nobody was interested. And there it was this. Yeah, it was really surprising because I've written for lots of different places. You know, I've been a journalist for 15 years, and there was the sense that the topic was a bit niche. That made me wonder, how can something that could potentially help over 50% of the population, how can that be considered niche? And then I held on to this story. Even though I didn't manage to place it. The story stayed with me, which doesn't happen with many other stories in journalism, you know. But this story stayed with me. And then the pandemic happened. And I think that changed a few things, because power dynamics shifted between the doctor's office and the patient's home, because we trusted people to test themselves for Covid. And, initially, when you think back to the start of Covid, men had worse symptoms than women. So, if you wanted to be cynical, you could say we started to pay attention to sex differences in health because men were more affected by Covid.
And that's when I finally managed to place the story. But the smart bras came out in the Guardian. It did really well, and I was invited as a result of that, to chair a panel at one of the first ever conferences focused on Femtech, which is female technology. So that's technology focused on female bodies. And I was completely blown away by this conference. I was drawn into this space. I was in my early 30s at the time. I'm in my mid-30s now and I have a child now, but at the time I knew that I wanted to have children soon. So, I was preparing for this, and I knew that the vast majority of first-time mothers experienced birth injuries, unfortunately.
So, I wanted to prevent that. And I was looking for solutions. And I found a company in California called Maternal Medical that's creating a preventative device for birth injuries. And I thought that was so fascinating. I spoke to the CEO, Tracy McNeil, and she told me that the last big innovation in the standard of care at birth, mostly epidural, which was popularized in the 1950s, and that was that just blew my mind because I was thinking, there's no other area of society or technology where we bring something out from the 1950s and we say to people, hey, look, this is the best we got. Look at this cutting-edge floppy disk over here. But in birth, that's exactly what we do. And I thought that was shocking. And the more I looked into the space of what I describe as vagina-centric innovation, the more I realized that one of the biggest or perhaps the biggest obstacle is that most investors are male, and they don't want to invest in these companies because there's so much stigma around these topics.
And I have a quote from one investor who says in the book, “I don't want to talk about vaginas at my Monday morning partner meeting.” And that's the kind of attitude that stands in the way of innovation focused on female bodies. And that just made me so angry. Yeah, I wrote an article called “We Need to Talk about Investors Problem with Vaginas”, and that went viral, came out in Wired magazine. And then I took this as my what they call a proof of concept in the business world, to then write a book and look at this movement and, you know, tell the story of the Femtech movement.
Dr. Craig Joseph: So, I love everything about that. What I wonder about is what is the right response to that. That partner who said, I don't want to talk about vaginas at my Monday morning partners meeting, right? It would seem to me in hindsight, the best response is, you know, would you like to talk about money?
Marina Gerner: Yes. Would you like to talk about the unmet need? Would you like to talk about the total addressable market? Would you like to talk about why these matters? And you know, if you don't want to talk about vaginas, maybe all the others also don't want to talk about vaginas. So, wouldn't you have an advantage if you were the odd one out?
Dr. Craig Joseph: Yeah, that makes sense. Is that message being received now because of some of these conversations, because of some of the female founders that you're referencing?
Marina Gerner: I sure hope so. I mean, my goal with the book is to change that conversation and to normalize that conversation, and that's why it was so important for me to have the word vagina on the cover, because I could have called this book lots of other things. And I actually, you know, faced lots of obstacles with that particular title, and I had to come up with 16 alternative titles at one point. All of those titles were tested on a target audience in A/B testing by my publisher. And then The Vagina Business won. So ultimately, this title won in the market research. But there's been a lot of resistance to it. But the point of the book is to destigmatize the conversation. So, I figured if I put the word vagina right next to the word business, you know, and the book can sometimes be found in the business section, sometimes it's in the social sciences section. It depends on the bookstore, but it stands out wherever it is.
Dr. Craig Joseph: I love it. And did you get pushbacks from someone other than the publisher?
Marina Gerner: Oh, yes. Yeah. So, the publisher also had feedback from independent bookstores who said that they wouldn't display it, and they wouldn't promote it. I had pushbacks from when I was reaching out to other authors to write endorsements for the book. One author said to me the title is too much for her, so she wouldn't write me a blurb. I had a venue turn me down when I wanted to have a book launch there, just purely based on the title. Some people who've written reviews for the book on Amazon have used the word vagina in the review, and then that was flagged as violating community guidelines. So, they've sent me screenshots of their reviews being censored. And I think there's a lot of censorship that happens behind the scenes where people wouldn't necessarily tell me, you know, nah, I think your book titles are too much for us, but they simply don't reply.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Wow. I'm just honestly shocked.
Marina Gerner: Yeah. No, this book was published a few months ago and it continues to be an obstacle. So, the book has already won two awards, which is amazing. And one of them was supposed to be announced in Dubai. So that didn't happen because they couldn't have mentioned the title on the stage of this big conference. And you know, that continues to be back. It keeps happening and it is shocking, but it's not too surprising because all of the founders I've interviewed in this space, whether that's menopause-related, UTI-focused, sex education, all these companies and nonprofits experienced censorship online. All of them.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Wow. I'm at a loss for words, and that's not typical for me. So.
Marina Gerner: I can believe that. Yeah.
Dr. Craig Joseph: It's just I get it in certain areas of the world maybe or but boy, widespread.
Marina Gerner: Yeah. Including things like lactation cookies, you know really things where you just wouldn't expect it.
Dr. Craig Joseph: You said that you were a professor at Stern as well. How did that come about?
Marina Gerner: So, I have these, some people call it what, my multi-hyphenate or, you know, portfolio career. I have these two tracks in my career. I've been a journalist from the age of 19, I think that is when I published my first article in a vague newspaper, and I also did a PhD in my early 20s. And so, I just continued doing those two things at the same time. I left academia for about five years to be in journalism full time as a staff writer. I returned to academia with this. It's an adjunct professor role, so it's part time. Yeah. It's wonderful. I teach a course called Commerce and Culture, which is very unusual because it combines, you know, business and society, business and culture.
And it's also what I'm doing with the book because I think women's health innovation is the perfect case study for that, because if you only looked at it from a business perspective, you'd think, hang on. This is our $1 trillion market opportunity, you know? Yeah. And you wouldn't understand the stigma and the cultural side of things if you only looked at it from the cultural side of things. You wouldn't understand the financial underpinning of everything. So, I think with a topic like that, my very idiosyncratic choice of subjects has come together in a way that's really helpful.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Some of the female founders that you talked about in the Femtech area, they all seem to be female.
Marina Gerner: Not all of them aren't.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Yeah. I was going to say, tell me about that.
Marina Gerner: About 80% are estimated to be female. But then there's a, you know, a fair amount of both founders and researchers and investors who are men. And I've included plenty of them in the book as well, because I think everybody needs to be on board with this subject. And it's an opportunity for everyone, really. Where it gets a bit complicated is when you look at the data on how much money different teams raise and unfortunately, most money, even in the Femtech space, is raised by all male teams. And that's where it becomes a structural issue because there's a company over here called Flo Health, which is a period tracker, and they've become the first European Femtech unicorn. And they were founded by a group of men. And so, when they became a unicorn, people were asking, you know, is it what do you make of it?
Is it a problem that it was set up by guys or is it a victory for all of us because they've raised all this money and they've achieved this unicorn status? And it's complicated in and of itself as a case study or as a one-off example. It is a good thing for the Femtech industry to have such an example, such an example of success. But if you look at the structural side of things and you realize, well, if it was led by a group of women, they wouldn't have raised that money. And so that's where it becomes difficult.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Tell me about that. We like to talk about design. The stat part of the part of the podcast designing and healthcare. And so Femtech design, are there any kind of overarching concepts that people just generally get wrong when designing for Femtech from? Not just the product itself necessarily, but maybe the, the, the conceptualizing of it and marketing of it and financing of it. Are there design flaws that you've seen that are common?
Marina Gerner: Yes. Let me just pull up a certain chapter in my book. What I do is I distinguish between Femtech and scam tech, and so Femtech is technology focused on female bodies, everything from periods to menopause, but also going beyond like cardiovascular health and bone health. And then you have scam tech, which is technology that monetizes insecurities and that, you know, mis-sells things. And so that's where we get to the insidious side of things. So, for instance, vagina steaming devices, you know, are harmful devices and those still exist. They're not banned. But we know that they can lead to all sorts of damage. There's also a range of intimate wash products that are potentially quite harmful. And then I've also found that there is a new version of the pink tax in health care.
So, you know, when we think of the pink tax, traditionally we would think of razors. And so pink razors that are marketed to women are more expensive than blue razors that are sold to men. And in healthcare we have generic drugs like ibuprofen being repackaged, put into pink packaging, and they're being called feminine acts or Midol. And those are then sold at a premium or period pain relief. So those are three categories. Kind of the actively damaging, the useless, potentially damaging and a new version, of the pink tax. And so, the questions I recommend asking are, does this product monetize shame in any way? So, does it imply that your body is dirty? Does it sell?
But is it painful? You know that that old idea? Does it provide a full sense of safety? Is it under regulate it for what it is? What data does it collect? You know, what claims does it make? What's the evidence and what emotions does it trigger? Because in the fertility space we sort of messaging that sounds, like you're running out of eggs, you know, quick, quick, quick. You're running out of eggs. You're almost 35. Your fertility is about to fall off a cliff. And so, whenever you have something that triggers your emotions so strongly, it's kind of worth pausing and asking, you know, what? Am I being sold here?
Dr. Craig Joseph: I'd say I've never heard of the pink tax, but it totally resonates.
Marina Gerner: Yeah, it applies. So, I usually use the example of razors. But you could also look at haircuts. You know, haircuts for women are so much more expensive or rain jacket all sorts of things. Once you start looking into them, you'll see the pink tax in them.
Dr. Craig Joseph: That is fascinating. How do you draw attention? You know, you've said some of the media of which you are somewhat a part of the media is not helping, right? Sometimes even in trying to advertise your or market your book.
Marina Gerner: Yeah, absolutely.
Dr. Craig Joseph: How do we get the folks in the media to be more comfortable, or is it just part of the overall culture of the area that they live in?
Marina Gerner: I think it's about shifting the conversation, and not just by making people more comfortable with certain terms, but also by just using certain terms, without using euphemisms, for example, because, you know, if people don't want to use vagina at a doctor's office and there are some surveys that show that I don't remember the exact percentage, but a really large percentage of young women don't want to use the word vagina at the doctor's office, and that has really terrible consequences further down the line.
How do we get people to use those words, and how do we get people to use words like perimenopause or endometriosis? And I think because if you don't know that something might happen to you or your friends or your family members, how are you supposed to address it? And there are still lots of people who think, okay, menopause is when your period stops one day and they're not really aware of perimenopause and the various symptoms, the 34 odd symptoms that can come with that. And the same goes for endometriosis. 10% of women are estimated to have endometriosis, but historically we've normalized female pain. Right? So, women were always told, oh, you've got period pain. Extreme period pain. Well, that's normal. And in reality, there could be an underlying issue there like endometriosis.
Dr. Craig Joseph: You're going back to your first example of heart attacks with women too. This has real world implications as you know, even if the signs of a certain disease are slightly different, it's on the healthcare side of being able to think about some of these things. And yeah, you're right. The average female having a heart attack doesn't have the same symptoms as the average man. And yet we only assume all heart, we kind of, most of us assume all heart attacks are, you know, chest pain feels like an elephant standing on my chest, that sort of thing. And that shows in the morbidity and mortality results of cardiac problems in women. Let me pivot a little to the concept of Femtech that term.
Some folks have a problem with that in saying that. Well, why does it? Why is it Femtech? Isn't it just tech?
Marina Gerner: Yeah.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Femtech, why does it need its own category?
Marina Gerner: I have lots of thoughts on this. I think the first funny thing is with term Femtech is whenever you use it, people hear fintech, financial technology. So, you know, oftentimes people think you talk about online banking when obviously that's not what we're talking about here. The term was coined by Ida Tin, the founder of CLU, in 2016, to bring together all these different kinds of companies that are innovating in women's health.
And so, what's special about it is that 80% of founders are female, and it's estimated to be a $1 trillion market opportunity. Obviously, I hope that Femtech will only be called tech one day, just like health tech, but will simply be health, right? Because tech will be a normal component of health care. And I think with Femtech, some people prefer to use the term women's health innovation. But I think the success of the movement does not really depend on what term we use exactly. And I think the term might evolve in the future as well. But right now, it's really helpful because people find each other by using that term as a hashtag on LinkedIn, on Instagram, there are conferences that are organized that are specifically called Femtech conferences, Femtech webinars, Femtech accelerators.
So, it's a term that has energized people and that has brought people together. And I think for that, it's really helpful. And a parallel example is, you know, feminism, you could say, well, isn't it simply equality or human rights? But we still have feminism for a certain reason, and hopefully we won't need feminism one day. And the same way I would say, hopefully we won't need the term Femtech one day it will all be tech because tech will serve us all equally.
Dr. Craig Joseph: So, are there any good examples or particularly interesting founders or companies that you've encountered in the writing of the book that you think deserve highlighting?
Marina Gerner: Absolutely. I could give you so many examples. It really depends on what part of women's health you're interested in. But there's for instance, in Copenhagen, there's a new form of contraception that's being developed called V, and it looks like a laundry capsule. It's transparent. And so, it's something you dissolve in the vagina, and it works together with the cervical mucus to keep sperm out. So, it's a non-hormonal form of contraception. And I think in the future we will have more non-hormonal choices. There's also contour line, which is a long-term contraceptive for men. It's a reversible vasectomy that uses hydrogel and that's being developed at the moment. So, I think there's a lot that will happen in the non-hormonal contraceptive space. Then there's also a device that's just come to the market in Ireland, which is a smart nipple shield.
So, you know, nipple shields are usually used when you're breastfeeding to either help with a latch of the baby or to protect the nipple. And historically, they've been made out of lots of different materials, like glass and pewter and plants even. I think this one is different because it has a sensor in it that can measure the amount of milk a baby is getting. And that could potentially be really helpful if you have babies with a low birth weight or, you know, if you have mothers who would like to breastfeed, but they're too worried about how much milk the baby's getting, you can also then use that information for research purposes. And that's the case with a lot of Femtech companies, is that they collect so much data we've never had before, that if you partner with researchers, you can get some incredible insights into how somebody's milk supply correlates with other aspects of their health.
Dr. Craig Joseph: That's amazing. As a pediatrician, all we could do was measure the number of minutes the baby was nursing and then the output. Right. We you could never really know what the baby was getting. So that would be incredibly helpful, especially for kids who are somewhat sick. And we really need to know about their fluid intake.
Marina Gerner: So that one's called the Coro. That device. Yeah.
Dr. Craig Joseph: That's awesome. So those are just a few of the kind of examples that are.
Marina Gerner: Yeah, I've interviewed over 100 people in the book. So, you'll find many, many, many more examples there. And I've interviewed people across 15 different countries because I wanted to show people the range of innovation there is.
Dr. Craig Joseph: If you could wave a magic wand and change just one thing about women's health care, how it's designed, how it's delivered, what would that be?
Marina Gerner: Oh, yes. I think there's something really universal, which is the normalization of female pain. I think if we reverse that, that would be a huge and revolutionary thing to do, because right now we still say to women, you know, extreme period pain, oh, that's normal pain with breastfeeding. That's normal. Oh, you're giving birth. Well, there's no birth without pain. IUD insertion. Well, you can't possibly expect pain relief, although that's slowly changing. But I think if we completely reverse that attitude across the world, that would be revolutionary.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Is there any specific advice that you'd give to aspiring entrepreneurs who are looking to break into Femtech? What can they learn? Besides reading the book for sure, what can they learn, to either avoid or make sure that they do?
Marina Gerner: Well, of course I was also going to say, read the book. All of my wisdom, all my treasures, contained in the book. And, you know, I'm giving them to the world. I think it's really important to if you're not a researcher, if you're not a medical professional, to assemble a team that you know, includes medical professionals, that includes researchers, and to make sure that whatever you're doing is evidence based. I think we see a lot of snake oil. Unfortunately, there are a lot of things that are not evidence based, especially in the area of supplements or apps or, you know, things that aren't regulated to a high standard. Always make sure that what you're doing addresses an actual problem, because I see companies that are addressing issues that aren't actually issues as well.
So, I've seen apps that will analyze your menstrual cycle and tell you if you're supposed to have a meeting or if you're particularly creative on that day. And that's just reductive. And it's just unhelpful. It's not constructive. So, make sure that you're addressing an actual problem that you find a, you know, solid unmet need. Make sure that there's a business model for your venture, that it can exist in a commercial frame, because not everything can exist in a commercial frame, even if it's a good idea, even if it addresses an unmet need. Put together a good team and think about how it will get funded. And you know, venture capital is not right for every company. And in fact, I think we need many, many other sources of funding in women's health.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Excellent. Well, we always like to end with the same question and the of all of the folks that we interview. And the question is this, is there something in your life that is so well designed that it brings you joy whenever you interact with it?
Marina Gerner: I would say my hands free and smart breast pump. So, I have a baby. I'm breastfeeding, and I also launched a book at the end of last year. So, I've had speaking engagements all over the world, and I always travel for the shortest possible amount of time. You know, a day and a half, maybe two days and one night. And I'm traveling with this breast pump that is quite small that I've used on the plane that you simply pop into your bra, and it doesn't have any wires that are, you know, attached to anything. It's relatively quiet. It's convenient. And on these trips, I always find myself thinking, wow, I'm so dependent on this device because, you know, without it I would risk having a clogged milk duct.
I could risk having mastitis, I could risk my milk supply going down and so on. But with this device, I've got the freedom to be away for a day or so. I used a breast pump on the plane, and I asked the flight attendant on the way back from San Francisco, I said to them, have you ever seen anyone else using a breast pump on the plane? And they said to me, oh yeah, actually, there was a woman there on Friday who used a breast pump. And I said, yep, that was me, because I was flying on the same schedule as the flight attendants. So, it's still quite rare, I guess. And there are certain suggestions I have on how they could improve that design. But I think compared to all the breast pumps, it's a much more convenient tool right now.
Dr. Craig Joseph: That's amazing. Doctor Marina Gerner, thank you so much for educating us about Femtech. And I would encourage everyone to check out your book, The Vagina Business, and to prominently display it in their front window.
Marina Gerner: Yes, that would be great. And please post about it on LinkedIn or on Instagram and feel free to tag me and I will reshare your posts.
Dr. Craig Joseph: Excellent. Well thank you again. I really appreciated the conversation.
Marina Gerner: Thank you so much for having me. It was great talking to you.